Where a School employee or volunteer is suspected of conduct which may constitute abuse or assault of a student at the school, an individual making a report to the children’s aid society shall notify the Head of School or manager who supervises the alleged perpetrator or designate of this report. Where the Head of School or manager is suspected of such conduct, the Headmaster shall be notified of the report. Where the Headmaster is suspected of such conduct, the Chair of the Board of Governors shall be notified of the report.
The subject matter of a complaint should not be discussed with the alleged perpetrator until specific instructions are received from the investigating police or the children’s aid society. This procedure is designed to secure the safety of any complainant/student or witnesses, to ensure that the rights of the complainant and the alleged perpetrator are protected, and to prevent possible destruction of evidence.
Further, an employee who makes an adverse report about another employee respecting suspected physical or sexual abuse or assault of a student by that other employee need not provide them with a copy of the report or any information about the report.
The School is obligated to address the interim status of employees and volunteers against whom allegations of abuse or assault have been made, pending a determination as to whether the abuse or assault occurred. In this regard, the paramount consideration must be the safety and security of the alleged victims, particularly where they are students. However, the decision as to interim status must also reflect a consistency of approach, procedural fairness to affected employees and volunteers, recognition that no findings of abuse or assault have been made and sensitivity to the impact of allegations upon the affected employees and volunteers.
Generally, where abuse or assault has been alleged against employees or volunteers, those individuals should be removed from the classroom or from situations involving unsupervised access to students, pending determination as to whether abuse or assault occurred. Such an approach demonstrates consistency and ultimately promotes not only the safety and security of the alleged victims but also fairness to the affected employees or volunteers. This decision is to be made by the Headmaster in consultation with People and Culture who may seek advice from the police/ legal counsel and/or the Children’s Aid Society in this regard. Removal is mandated when the School becomes aware that an employee has been charged with or convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code involving sexual conduct and minors, or of any other offence under the Criminal Code that in the opinion of the School indicates that students may be at risk.
Depending on the circumstances, removal may involve reassignment to other duties, suspension, or in some circumstances, immediate termination.
An employee or volunteer’s reassignment or employment status should generally be revisited upon completion of any police or Children’s Aid investigation after any criminal charges are laid, after any criminal case is completed, and upon completion of any internal investigation.
Alleged victims and alleged perpetrators are entitled to have the allegations addressed as discreetly as circumstances permit and, where information pertaining to the allegations is disseminated, the status of the allegations as allegations only should be articulated.
Where abuse or assault is alleged, it should be investigated by the police, together with the Children’s Aid Society if the allegations fall within the society’s mandate. Generally, any internal investigation should be deferred pending the conclusion of any ongoing or contemplated police investigation or resolution of any criminal charges. All instances of sexual assault, physical assault, and criminal harassment require police notification. Threats and other incidents may be reported to police on a discretionary basis, depending on the circumstances.
Once any investigation by police or the Children’s Aid Society is complete, the School will conduct an internal investigation or may choose to retain an independent third party to conduct the investigation if appropriate in the circumstances.
This decision will be made at the discretion of the Headmaster. The investigation will proceed as follows:
The investigator should meet with the complainant. During the course of this interview, the investigator should listen carefully, ask specific questions to elicit details, find out about the nature of the relationship with the alleged perpetrator (the “respondent”), ask about witnesses, and ask what the complainant would like to have happen.
The investigator should meet with the respondent. The respondent should be told the identity of the complainant and presented with the facts. The respondent should be asked for a specific response to each allegation, including the nature of the relationship, and whether there were any witnesses. The investigator should remain neutral and reserve judgment until all facts have been collected.
The investigator should interview each witness mentioned by the parties. These witnesses should be interviewed separately. The investigator should determine whether these individuals were actually present at the time of the alleged behaviour, or whether they simply heard about the incident afterwards. Each witness should be informed of the importance of confidentiality.
Based on the information received, the School, in consultation with legal counsel, should determine whether or not the incident warrants disciplinary, remedial, or other steps. The seriousness of the incident must be determined and appropriate action taken.
Any internal investigation conducted by the School and any resulting disciplinary proceedings should be informed by the desirability of:
Avoiding or reducing trauma to the student through unnecessary or inappropriate questioning;
Respecting the confidentiality and privacy interests of all affected parties, to the extent possible;
Ensuring fairness to the School employee or volunteer against whom a complaint has been made;
Ensuring an accurate and objective determination, free from stereotypical notions about sexual misconduct;
students or teachers.
Where practicable, any internal investigation should be conducted by individuals with appropriate training and skills respecting abuse cases and, where applicable, sexual abuse or assault cases. An outside investigator may be retained to conduct such an investigation, at the School’s discretion.
A criminal conviction or finding of guilt will justify disciplinary action, up to and including termination for cause. The same outcome may also result following an internal investigation even where there is no criminal conviction, since criminal charges involve a different onus of proof and different rules of admissibility.
The School shall promptly notify the Ontario College of Teachers in writing when it becomes aware that a member who is or has been employed by the School:
has been charged with or convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code involving sexual conduct and minors; or
has been charged with or convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code that in the School’s opinion indicates that students may be at risk of harm or injury; or
has resigned or terminated their employment with the School, during an investigation into allegations that the member engaged in physical or sexual abuse or assault.
The School shall promptly notify the Ontario College of Teachers in writing and no later than 30 days from when it has dismissed, suspended or imposed restrictions on a member in its employ for engaging in abuse or assault, and provide the reasons for such action.
The School shall promptly notify the Ontario College of Teachers in writing where, in the opinion of the School, the conduct or actions of a member who is or has been employed by the School, should be reviewed by a committee of the Ontario College of Teachers. One example of such conduct is that which, if proven, amounts to offensive conduct of a sexual nature that may affect the personal integrity or security of any student or the school environment.
Where a current or former employee or volunteer is not a member of the Ontario College of Teachers, the School shall promptly notify any applicable licensing body in writing of the circumstances set out above.